15 Comments
User's avatar
Aaron Jay's avatar

I would like to know if they will eventually drop the territory rights or not.

Expand full comment
Kartik Krishnaiyer's avatar

My understanding is that it is a very contentious issue internally with some of the clubs who voted for promotion & relegation doing so under the premise that they would continue to get protected originally not 100 miles or 75 miles but something like 15 or 20 miles - so this has to be worked out

Expand full comment
Bobby Brandon, III's avatar

That still allows a twin city/big 'burb to potentially have a team which is interesting.

Expand full comment
ChrisGaines_'s avatar

I don't know how realistic it is. I was thinking a solution to the territory rights issue would be a double expansion fee. Basically if a new team was looking to move into what previously was a teams protected territory the new team would pay an expansion fee to the league and one to the existing team. That would make the price a little more prohibitive to keep teams from stacking up and also insure the existing team was remunerated in some fashion. There's a few other things I would add as well: population, brand location, unique culture of expansion location.

Expand full comment
George Pasley's avatar

So that 15 to 20 mile radius limits it to one club per city/town in most cases. Sounds like they want pro/rel without local competition. I can see restricting locations if you're buying in, but what happens when pro/rel actually starts and you have two clubs that were in different divisions now being in the same division with an "across the bridge" derby?

Expand full comment
Aaron Jay's avatar

fans should have the right to pick what teams they want to support and who they relate with the most. Imagine if Michigan Stars or whatever they are called joined. You with DCFC all the left-wing and them the right wings supporting them. lol that would be a great intense derby lol

Expand full comment
George Pasley's avatar

Ha. Getting Celtic/Rangers vibes. Just gotta keep the violence to a minimum...

Expand full comment
Aaron Jay's avatar

hahaha you read my mind :D Their US Open Cup game last year was legendary. Especially with the smoke towards the end of the game :D

Expand full comment
Kartik Krishnaiyer's avatar

but maybe I need to clarify that in the future because when I use the term division three I mean USL L1 when I use the term division 2 I mean USL championship

Expand full comment
SoocerKing's avatar

"Division 2" in college soccer is the NAIA, so that's another source of potential confusion.

And with NCAA Division 1 schools proposing to join the USL ecosystem --presumably at the USL League One level/ "division 3"-- as part of their hopes for year round soccer, that is going to further confuse people. It is probably less confusing for now to just refer to the USL level by name --USL Championship-- especially since USL Premier is a few years away for actuality....

Expand full comment
Aaron Jay's avatar

All colleges should just team up with USL2 and their season can go from March up until October. Combine some regions so teams get more games in the year including Jaegermeister Cup.

Expand full comment
Kartik Krishnaiyer's avatar

L2 is basically D4

Expand full comment
George Pasley's avatar

I noticed Lee mentioned a concern about having too many East or West clubs in a division. Goes back to my suggestion of just splitting the country in half and having two separate pyramids. I can see his explanation of how regions would even work getting complicated if they hold on to having a "national" league. His travels across country should have told him that maybe something different is needed. Keep it simple...

Expand full comment
SoocerKing's avatar

Kartik correction! At the 2 min. mark, I think you meant "Omaha going to USL CHAMPIONSHIP" --not "League 2" !:

Expand full comment
Kartik Krishnaiyer's avatar

I said division two, which is the championship.

Expand full comment